Page 69 - PCC14

19. So EW, Ng EH, Wong YY, Yeung WS, Ho PC. Acupuncture for frozen- thawed embryo transfer cycles: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;20:814–21, Level I.
20. El-Toukhy T, Sunkara SK, Khairy M, Dyer R, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture in in vitro fertilization. BJOG 2008;115:1203–13, Level III.
21. El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y. The impact of acupuncture on assisted reproductive technology outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21:240–6, Level III.
22. Manheimer E, van der Windt D, Cheng K, Stafford K, Liu J, Tierney J, et al. The effects of acupuncture on rates of clinical pregnancy among women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:696–713, Level III.
23. Cheong YC, Dix S, Hung Yu Ng E, Ledger WL, Farquhar C. Acupuncture
and assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2013:Cd006920, Level III.
24. van der Ven H, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S, Pless V, Krebs D. The effect of gen-
eral anaesthesia on the success of embryo transfer following human in-
vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1988;3(Suppl 2):81–3, Level II-2.
25. Okhowat J, Murtinger M, Schuff M, Wogatzky J, Spitzer D, Vanderzwalmen P, et al. Massage therapy improves in vitro fertilization outcome in patients undergoing blastocyst transfer in a cryo-cycle. Altern
Ther Health Med 2015;21:16–22, Level II-2.
26. Zhang R, Feng XJ, Guan Q, Cui W, Zheng Y, Sun W, et al. Increase of suc-
cess rate for women undergoing embryo transfer by transcutaneous elec- trical acupoint stimulation: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled study. Fertil Steril 2011;96:912–6, Level I.
27. Hullender Rubin LE, Opsahl MS, Wiemer KE, Mist SD, Caughey AB. Impact of whole systems traditional Chinese medicine on in-vitro fertilization out- comes. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;30:602–12, Level II-2.
28. Brook N, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A, Edgeworth J, Braude P. A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics (co-amoxiclav) prior to embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2911–5, Level I.
29. Kroon B, Hart RJ, Wong BM, Ford E, Yazdani A. Antibiotics prior to em- bryo transfer in ART. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012:Cd008995, Level III.
30. Hannoun A, Zreik TG, Ghaziri G, Abu Musa A, Awwad J. Effect of powdered gloves, worn at the time of embryo transfer, on the pregnancy outcome of IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009;26:25–7, Level I.
31. Coroleu B, Carreras O, Veiga A, Martell A, Martinez F, Belil I, et al. Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000;15:616–20, Level I.
32. Coroleu B, Barri PN, Carreras O, Martinez F, Veiga A, Balasch J. The useful- ness of ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospec- tive randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2885–90, Level I.
33. Li R, Lu L, Hao G, Zhong K, Cai Z, Wang W. Abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves clinical pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: experiences from 330 clinical investigations. J Assist Reprod Genet 2005; 22:3–8, Level I.
34. Matorras R, Urquijo E, Mendoza R, Corcostegui B, Exposito A, Rodriguez- Escudero FJ. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:1762–6, Level I.
35. Tang OS, Ng EH, So WW, Ho PC. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2310–5, Level I.
36. Ali CR, Khashan AS, Horne G, Fitzgerald CT, Nardo LG. Implantation, clin- ical pregnancy and miscarriage rates after introduction of ultrasound- guided embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:88–93, Level II-2.
37. Mirkin S, Jones EL, Mayer JF, Stadtmauer L, Gibbons WE, Oehninger S. Impact of transabdominal ultrasound guidance on performance and outcome of transcervical uterine embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003;20:318–22, Level II-2.
38. Prapas Y, Prapas N, Hatziparasidou A, Prapa S, Nijs M, Vanderzwalmen P, et al. The echoguide embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results. Acta Eur Fertil 1995;26:113–5, Level II-1.
39. Prapas Y, Prapas N, Hatziparasidou A, Vanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Prapa S, et al. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day
3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5. Hum Reprod
2001;16:1904–8, Level II-2.
40. Wood EG, Batzer FR, Go KJ, Gutmann JN, Corson SL. Ultrasound-guided
soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertil-
ization. Hum Reprod 2000;15:107–12, Level II-2.
41. Eskandar M, Abou-Setta AM, Almushait MA, El-Amin M, Mohmad SE. Ul-
trasound guidance during embryo transfer: a prospective, single-operator,
randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1187–90, Level I.
42. Hurley VA, Osborn JC, Leoni MA, Leeton J. Ultrasound-guided embryo
transfer: a controlled trial. Fertil Steril 1991;55:559–62, Level I.
43. Kan AK, Abdalla HI, Gafar AH, Nappi L, Ogunyemi BO, Thomas A, et al. Em- bryo transfer: ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch. Hum Reprod 1999;
14:1259–61, Level I.
44. Sallam HN, Sadek SS. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a meta-analysis
of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1042–6, Level III.
45. Abou-Setta AM, Mansour RT, Al-Inany HG, Aboulghar MM, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI. Among women undergoing embryo transfer, is the probability of pregnancy and live birth improved with ultrasound guidance over clinical touch alone? A systemic review and meta-analysis
of prospective randomized trials. Fertil Steril 2007;88:333–41, Level III.
46. Buckett WM. A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch
embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1037–41, Level III.
47. Teixeira DM, Dassuncao LA, Vieira CV, Barbosa MA, Coelho Neto MA, Nastri CO, et al. Ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Ob-
stet Gynecol 2015;45:139–48, Level III.
48. Brown J, Buckingham K, Buckett W, Abou-Setta AM. Ultrasound versus
'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016:CD006107, Level III.
49. Lindheim SR, Cohen MA, Sauer MV. Ultrasound guided embryo transfer significantly improves pregnancy rates in women undergoing oocyte dona-
tion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;66:281–4, Level II-2.
50. Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Martinez-Salazar J, Landazabal A, Requena A,
Remohi J, et al. Transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not increase pregnancy rates in oocyte recipients. Fertil Steril 2002;78: 534–9, Level I.
51. Chen SC, Lai TH, Lee FK. The influence of abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer on pregnancy rate: a preliminary report. Fertil Steril 2007;87:1235–7, Level I.
52. al-Shawaf T, Dave R, Harper J, Linehan D, Riley P, Craft I. Transfer of em- bryos into the uterus: how much do technical factors affect pregnancy rates? J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;10:31–6, Level II-2.
53. Ammar AR, Mousa KS, Rabei NH, Galal A. Effect of ultrasound guided em- bryo transfer on pregnancy rates. New York Sci J 2013;6:79–83, Level I.
54. Davar R, Ghandi S, Tayebi N. Does transabdominal ultrasound-guided em- bryo transfer improve pregnancy rates in ART cycles. Iran J Reprod Med 2007;5:95–8, Level I.
55. Drakeley AJ, Jorgensen A, Sklavounos J, Aust T, Gazvani R, Williamson P, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of 2295 ultrasound-guided em- bryo transfers. Hum Reprod 2008;23:1101–6, Level I.
56. Kosmas IP, Janssens R, De Munck L, Al Turki H, Van der Elst J, Tournaye H, et al. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Re- prod 2007;22:1327–34, Level I.
57. de Camargo Martins AM, Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen C, Oliveira JB, Contart P, et al. Ultrasound guidance is not necessary during easy embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:421–5, Level I.
58. Lambers MJ, Dogan E, Kostelijk H, Lens JW, Schats R, Hompes PG. Ultraso- nographic-guided embryo transfer does not enhance pregnancy rates compared with embryo transfer based on previous uterine length measure- ment. Fertil Steril 2006;86:867–72, Level II-2.
59. Shamonki MI, Schattman GL, Spandorfer SD, Chung PH, Rosenwaks Z. Ul- trasound-guided trial transfer may be beneficial in preparation for an IVF cycle. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2844–9, Level II-2.
60. Woolcott R, Stanger J. Potentially important variables identified by transva- ginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1997;12:963–6, Level II-3.
Page 62 of 69
893
Fertility and Sterility®
VOL. 107 NO. 4 / APRIL 2017
PRECONGRESS COURSE 14 I BARCELONA, SPAIN – 1 JULY 2018 69