Page 71 - PCC14

101. Tiras B, Polat M, Korucuoglu U, Zeyneloglu HB, Yarali H. Impact of embryo replacement depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1341–5, Level II-2.
102. Cenksoy PO, Ficicioglu C, Yesiladali M, Akcin OA, Kaspar C. The impor- tance of the length of uterine cavity, the position of the tip of the inner catheter and the distance between the fundal endometrial surface and the air bubbles as determinants of the pregnancy rate in IVF cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;172:46–50, Level II-2.
103. Abdelmassih VG, Neme RM, Dozortsev D, Abdelmassih S, Diamond MP, Abdelmassih R. Location of the embryo-transfer catheter guide before the internal uterine os improves the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2007;88:499–503, Level II-2.
104. Martinez F, Coroleu B, Parriego M, Carreras O, Belil I, Parera N, et al. Ultra- sound-guided embryo transfer: immediate withdrawal of the catheter versus a 30 second wait. Hum Reprod 2001;16:871–4, Level I.
105. Sroga JM, Montville CP, Aubuchon M, Williams DB, Thomas MA. Effect of delayed versus immediate embryo transfer catheter removal on pregnancy outcomes during fresh cycles. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2088–90, Level II-2.
106. Alvero R, Hearns-Stokes RM, Catherino WH, Leondires MP, Segars JH. The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1848–52, Level II-2.
107. Awonuga A, Nabi A, Govindbhai J, Birch H, Stewart B. Contamination of embryo transfer catheter and treatment outcome in in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998;15:198–201, Level II-2.
108. Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Polz W, Tews G. The inef- fective loading process of the embryo transfer catheter alters implantation and pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 2001;76:630–2, Level II-2.
109. Listijono DR, Boylan T, Cooke S, Kilani S, Chapman MG. An analysis of the impact of embryo transfer difficulty on live birth rates, using a standardised grading system. Hum Fertil 2013;16:211–4, Level II-2.
110. Moragianni VA, Cohen JD, Smith SE, Schinfeld JS, Somkuti SG, Lee A, et al. Effect of macroscopic or microscopic blood and mucus on the success rates of embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2010;93:570–3, Level II-2.
111. Nabi A, Awonuga A, Birch H, Barlow S, Stewart B. Multiple attempts at em- bryo transfer: does this affect in-vitro fertilization treatment outcome? Hum Reprod 1997;12:1188–90, Level II-2.
112. Tiras B, Korucuoglu U, Polat M, Saltik A, Zeyneloglu HB, Yarali H. Effect of blood and mucus on the success rates of embryo transfers. Eur J Obstet Gy- necol Reprod Biol 2012;165:239–42, Level II-2.
113. Neithardt AB, Segars JH, Hennessy S, James AN, McKeeby JL. Embryo after- loading: a refinement in embryo transfer technique that may increase clin- ical pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2005;83:710–4, Level II-2.
114. Phillips JA, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Raine-Fenning NJ. Difficult embryo transfers or blood on catheter and assisted reproductive outcomes: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;168:121–8, Level III.
115. Plowden TC, Hill MJ, Miles SM, Hoyt B, Yauger B, Segars JH, et al. Does the presence of blood in the catheter or the degree of difficulty of em- bryo transfer affect live birth? Reprod Sci 2016 [Epub ahead of print], Level II-2.
116. Silberstein T, Weitzen S, Frankfurter D, Trimarchi JR, Keefe DL, Plosker SM. Cannulation of a resistant internal os with the malleable outer sheath of a coaxial soft embryo transfer catheter does not affect in vitro fertilization- embryo transfer outcome. Fertil Steril 2004;82:1402–6, Level II-2.
117. Goudas VT, Hammitt DG, Damario MA, Session DR, Singh AP, Dumesic DA. Blood on the embryo transfer catheter is associated with decreased rates of embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1998;70: 878–82, Level II-2.
118. Munoz M, Meseguer M, Lizan C, Ayllon Y, Perez-Cano I, Garrido N. Bleeding during transfer is the only parameter of patient anatomy and em- bryo quality that affects reproductive outcome: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 2009;92:953–5, Level II-2.
119. Rhodes TL, McCoy TP, Higdon HL 3rd, Boone WR. Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2005;22:335–46, Level II-2.
120. Sallam HN, Agameya AF, Rahman AF, Ezzeldin F, Sallam AN. Ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle before embryo transfer: a prospec- tive controlled study. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1767–72, Level II-1.
121. Visser DS, Fourie FL, Kruger HF. Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: ef- fect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;10:37–43, Level II-2.
122. Yaniv S, Elad D, Jaffa AJ, Eytan O. Biofluid aspects of embryo transfer. Ann Biomed Eng 2003;31:1255–62.
123. Eytan O, Elad D, Jaffa AJ. Evaluation of the embryo transfer protocol by a laboratory model of the uterus. Fertil Steril 2007;88:485–93.
124. Eytan O, Elad D, Jaffa AJ. Bioengineering studies of the embryo transfer procedure. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1101:21–37.
125. Yaniv S, Jaffa AJ, Elad D. Modeling embryo transfer into a closed uterine cavity. J Biomech Eng 2012;134:111003.
126. Eytan O, Zaretsky U, Jaffa AJ, Elad D. In vitro simulations of embryo transfer in a laboratory model of the uterus. J Biomech 2007;40:1073–80.
127. Groeneveld E, de Leeuw B, Vergouw CG, Visser OW, Lambers MJ,
Heymans MW, et al. Standardization of catheter load speed during embryo transfer: comparison of manual and pump-regulated embryo transfer. Re- prod Biomed Online 2012;24:163–9.
128. Caanen MR, van der Houwen LE, Schats R, Vergouw CG, de Leeuw B, Lambers MJ, et al. Embryo transfer with controlled injection speed to in- crease pregnancy rates: A randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2016;81:394–404, Level I.
129. Oraif A, Hollet-Caines J, Feyles V, Rebel M, Abduljabar H. Do multiple at- tempts at embryo transfer affect clinical pregnancy rates? J Obstet Gynae- col Can 2014;36:406–7, Level II-3.
130. Lee HC, Seifer DB, Shelden RM. Impact of retained embryos on the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 2004;82: 334–7, Level II-2.
131. Poindexter AN 3rd, Thompson DJ, Gibbons WE, Findley WE, Dodson MG, Young RL. Residual embryos in failed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1986;46: 262–7, Level II-2.
132. Tur-Kaspa I, Yuval Y, Bider D, Levron J, Shulman A, Dor J. Difficult or repeated sequential embryo transfers do not adversely affect in-vitro fertilization pregnancy rates or outcome. Hum Reprod 1998;13: 2452–5, Level II-2.
133. Vicdan K, Isik AZ, Akarsu C, Sozen E, Caglar G, Dingiloglu B, et al. The ef- fect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;134: 79–82, Level II-2.
134. Yi HJ, Koo HS, Cha SH, Kim HO, Park CW, Song IO. Reproductive outcomes of retransferring retained embryos in blastocyst transfer cycles. Clin Exp Re- prod Med 2016;43:133–8, Level II-2.
135. Silberstein T, Trimarchi JR, Shackelton R, Weitzen S, Frankfurter D, Plosker S. Ultrasound-guided miduterine cavity embryo transfer is associ- ated with a decreased incidence of retained embryos in the transfer cath- eter. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1510–2, Level II-2.
136. Botta G, Grudzinskas G. Is a prolonged bed rest following embryo transfer useful? Hum Reprod 1997;12:2489–92, Level I.
137. Amarin ZO, Obeidat BR. Bed rest versus free mobilisation following embryo transfer: a prospective randomised study. BJOG 2004;111:1273–6, Level I.
138. Purcell KJ, Schembri M, Telles TL, Fujimoto VY, Cedars MI. Bed rest after embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2007;87:
1322–6, Level I.
139. Lambers MJ, Lambalk CB, Schats R, Hompes PG. Ultrasonographic evi-
dence that bedrest after embryo transfer is useless. Gynecol Obstet Invest
2009;68:122–6, Level I.
140. Li B, Zhou H, Li W. Bed rest after embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Re-
prod Biol 2011;155:125–8, Level III.
141. Abou-Setta AM, Peters LR, D'Angelo A, Sallam HN, Hart RJ, Al-Inany HG.
Post-embryo transfer interventions for assisted reproduction technology
cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:Cd006567, Level III.
142. Craciunas L, Tsampras N. Bed rest following embryo transfer might nega- tively affect the outcome of IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hum Fertil (Camb) 2016;19:16–22, Level III.
Page 64 of 69
895
Fertility and Sterility®
VOL. 107 NO. 4 / APRIL 2017
PRECONGRESS COURSE 14 I BARCELONA, SPAIN – 1 JULY 2018 71