Page 107 - PCC02

Technology solutions:
The embryo cloud concept – e.g. DANA
Slide courtesy of Marcus Meseguer, IVI RMA Alegre L, et al. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:e239 (P-347).
The evolution of software analysis in TL:V1.0
25 20 15 10
5 0
Non‐implant
Implant IVI‐Valencia/D2012.07.25_S0517_I106
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
cc2 = t3–t2
Ranking
X‐axis param: 2‐cell3‐cell Y‐axis param: 3‐cell4‐cell
Plot by
Clinic
More observation s Better selection
Outcome Both
Slide courtesy of Marcus Meseguer, IVI RMA
Top rank Avg dist (hr)
3 0.22 6 0.25 8 0.31 7 0.34 2 0.75 11 0.79 12 0.94 10 1.45 1 2.65
4 (no rank) - 5 (no rank) - 9 (no rank) -
Bottom rank
Note: selected parameters not measured for wells: 4, 5, and 9
Page 101 of 151
Implant
X‐axis
2-cell
Y‐axis
3-cell
Blastocyst Transfer
Outcome type
to to
3-cell
Marker size: < 6 > Marker fill: < 20% >
Alegre L, et al. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:e239 (P-347).
s2 = t4–t3
Filter by clinic
Filter by outcome Select Filter by year Select Overlay my patient
Select clinic
4-cell Select
PRECONGRESS COURSE 02 I BARCELONA, SPAIN – 1 JULY 2018 107