Page 46 - ESHRE2019
P. 46
Judgements are inconsistent
Judgements are inconsistent
• New meta-research study – included trials in reviews with same population and outcome.
• Still found considerable disagreement (agreement range 57% for random sequence generation to 81% for random sequence generation).
• Reasons – most common was difference in interpretation of information. Access to different information explained quite a few (e.g. 24% of disagreements for random sequence generation).
44
41
