Page 55 - ESHRE2019
P. 55

 Favo
   Comparison
PB vsCC LET
MF
CC+MF TAM
LET vs PB MF
CC+MF TAM
MF vs LET CC+MF
TAM
FSH
CC+MF vs MF TAM
FSH
LOD
TAM vs CC+MF FSH
LOD
FSH vs TAM LOD
LOD vs FSH
OR (95% CI) (95% PrI)
0.30 (0.15,0.58) (0.11,0.81) 1.58 (1.25,2.00) (0.74,3.39) 1.06 (0.75,1.50) (0.47,2.37) 1.81 (1.35,2.42) (0.83,3.95) 0.72 (0.42,1.22) (0.29,1.78) 1.69 (0.85,3.37) (0.61,4.65) 0.52 (0.15,1.79) (0.12,2.25)
5.35 (2.63,10.87) (1.91,14.94) 3.58 (1.93,6.63) (1.37,9.37) 6.11 (3.02,12.38) (2.19,17.04) 2.43 (1.03,5.73) (0.78,7.60) 5.71 (2.18,15.00) (1.67,19.50) 1.77 (0.44,7.22) (0.35,8.91)
0.67 (0.45,1.01) (0.29,1.55) 1.14 (0.79,1.65) (0.50,2.59) 0.45 (0.26,0.80) (0.18,1.15) 1.07 (0.52,2.21) (0.38,3.03) 0.33 (0.09,1.16) (0.08,1.45)
1.71 (1.15,2.53) (0.74,3.91) 0.68 (0.36,1.28) (0.26,1.79) 1.59 (0.74,3.45) (0.54,4.67) 0.50 (0.14,1.78) (0.11,2.22)
0.40 (0.22,0.73) (0.15,1.03) 0.93 (0.44,1.97) (0.33,2.68) 0.29 (0.08,1.03) (0.07,1.28)
2.35 (0.99,5.60) (0.74,7.41) 0.73 (0.19,2.78) (0.15,3.45)
0.31 (0.08,1.27) (0.06,1.57)
           FSH LOD
          FSH LOD
               LOD
                                       .1 .3 1 5 20
rs second intervention Favors first intervention
   Results - Ranking
CC CC+MF FSH
12345678 12345678 12345678 LET LOD MF
12345678 12345678 12345678 PB TAM
12345678 12345678
Rank
SUrface under Cumulative RAnking
1st
                                                                                                                                                                                  Graphs by Treatment
8th
  50
PRECONGRESS COURSE 14 I VIENNA, AUSTRIA – 23 JUNE 2019 53
    Probabilities 0 .2.4.6.8 1 0 .2.4.6.8 1
0 .2.4.6.8 1
0 .2.4.6.8 1 0 .2.4.6.8 1
0 .2.4.6.8 1
0 .2.4.6.8 1
0 .2.4.6.8 1



















































   53   54   55   56   57