Page 79 - Eshre 2018
P. 79

  Results of ten years’ of Onco‐FP
Elective Fertility Preservation
 Patients returning (%)
Mean age at vitrification
Mean age at return
Mean storage time (years) Warming Cycles/patient
Mean warmed oocytes/patient Survival rate
Number of transfers
Mean embryos Transferred IR
CPR/transfer
OPR/transfer
No Live Birth/patient
78 (7.4) 34.5 ± 2.1 38.3 ± 3.5 4.0 ± 0.9
79 (1.0 ± 0.01) 592 (7.6 ± 2.8) 81.8
56 (71.8) 1.4 ± 0.1 33.0
23 (41.8)
18 (32.1) 18/69* (26.0)
    No patients
No warming cycles/patient NoET/patient
NoCryo transfers/warming cycle IR
CPR/transfer
OPR/transfer
No Live Birth
C Live birth rate/Patient
20 (25.6%) 28/20 (1.4 ± 1.7) 36 (1.3±1.4) 27 (0.96 ± 0.1) 31.3
9 (37.5)
7 (25.9)
7 (35.0) 25/69* (36.2)
IVI unpublished data
Cryotransfers of surplus embryos
               Indication (different populations)
EFP Onco‐FP
Poor responders Donors oocytes
Antagonist Agonist
Clomiphene Letrozole
Type of Stimulation
Age
≤ 35 years
> 35 years
Number of oocytes
Oocytes Survival
CLBR
Which factors are related
to success Fertility Preservation?
                                   Page 73 of 135
  PRECONGRESS COURSE 16 I BARCELONA, SPAIN – 1 JULY 2018 79
   




















































   77   78   79   80   81