Page 125 - ESHRE2019

Editorial decision
Assessment of reviewers’ reportsby AE. Synthesisof reportsand recommendation by AEto
the Editor-in-Chief
Assessment of manuscript in context of reviewers’ reports(usually 2) and AErecommendation.
Overall priority for publication.
A Clear response back from AE....
“Ihave decided to recommend that your submission isnot suitable for publication in MHR, and so have had to reject yoursubmission.
A l t h o u g h Re v i e w e r 1 l i st s o n l y m i n o r t e x t u a l changes, Reviewer 2 hasraised a number of important criticismsaround statistical analysisand the lack of suitably controlled experiments. I agree w i t h t h e se r e m a r k s. I a m so r r y t h a t t h i s i s n o t t h e outcome you would have wanted.”
120
PRECONGRESS COURSE 14 I VIENNA, AUSTRIA – 23 JUNE 2019 123