Page 49 - ESHRE2019

PORTO UNIVERSITY Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences
CONCLUSIONS
PORTO UNIVERSITY
a) b)
Evidence point low FA levels among young men
This intervention seem not to increase men’s FA (small sample). Other intervention studies:
• Did not include men (Stern et al., 2013, Williamson et al., 2014; Garcia et al., 2016)
• Did not explored gender diferences/few male participants: Wojcieszek & Thompson, 2013,
Conceição et al., 2017; Anspach et al., 2017; Boivin et al., 2018
• Daniluk & Koert (2015) found that FA gains were not maintained 6 months after, particularly for men; Maeda (2016) found similar increase on FA for both women and men
PCCESHRE2019, VIENNA 19
Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences
4. HOWCANWEIMPROVEMEN’SFERTILITYKNOWLEDGE? •Best format/context:
social media forums, primary healthcare professionals (results from focus group, Hammarberg et al., 2017c)
education should be tailored (Garcia, 2016; Stern et al., 2013; Hvidman et al., 2015)
Personalized, based on own risk (e.g., using FertiStat; example of appointment on FAC clinic)
Directed for men and women, explicitly (“Your Fertility”, Hammarberg et al., 2017b)
PCCESHRE2019, VIENNA 20
44
PRECONGRESS COURSE 08 I VIENNA, AUSTRIA – 23 JUNE 2019 47