Page 65 - ESHRE2019
P. 65
CONCLUSION
• MRimaging:Excellent NPV of adenomyosisand endometriosis
• Sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,PPVandNPVofMRI areverygood • AllowingthefactthattheMRIprotocolisoptimal
• Digestivepreparationprevioustotheexamination
• Antiperistaltic agent administration per examination
• Highresolutionthinslicessequences
• Abdominopelviccoveragetoassessurinarytract,caeco-appendicularareaandsmallbowel
• Structuredreport :Enzianclassification
BIBLIOGRAPHY REFERENCES
• Bazot et al, European Society of Urogenital Radiology Guidelines, 2018
• Bazot et al, Role of t r ansvaginal sonogr aphy and magnet ic r esonance imaging in t he diagnosis of ut er ine adenomyosis, Fer t l st er il
2018
• Tamai et al,MRfindingsof adenomyosis,Radiographics2005
• Thomassin, Bazot et al Comparison of the accuracy of rectal endoscopic sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosisof colorectal endometriosis,Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol.2017
• Nyango K.Thomassin-Naggara I, et al., performance of MRenterography, JMinim Invasive Gynecol. 2018
• Chamie et al,Atypical sites of deeply infiltrative endometriosis,Radiographics 2018
• Rousset et al,Bowel endometriosis:pre-operative diagnostic accuracy of 3T MREnterography,Radiology 2014
• Thomassinet al,Imagingofpost-operativeendometriosis,Diagnosticandinterventionalimaging2019
• DiPaolaet al,DetectionandlocalizationofdeependometriosisbymeansofMRIandcorrelationwiththeENZIAN score,EJR 2015
60
PRECONGRESS COURSE 03 I VIENNA, AUSTRIA – 23 JUNE 2019 63
