Page 105 - ESHRE2019
P. 105

  Time‐lapse evaluation of re‐expansion of warmed blastocysts
ZP thickness Start ZP thickness
(μm) Area (μm2) expansion (μm) Area (μm2)
(min)
            Model Effect
Day of Vitrification
Maternal Age
Values
     A vs D
  B vs D
A vs C
B vs C
BD5 vs BD6
1 year
OR(CI95%)
7,612 (1.757‐32.973)
6.716 (1.439‐31.335)
1.807 (0.831‐3.930)
1.498 (0.930‐2.411)
1.682 (1.084‐2.640)
1.03 (0.95‐1.11)
p
 Morphology dynamics
0.007
0.015
   ns
 ASEBIR Blastocyst Morphology
  ns
   0.020
   ns
  Morphology dynamics of warmed blastocyst is related with implantation potential independently of day of vitrification, maternal age or conventional embryo morphology
              Automatic annotations and computer analysis added to cleavage embryos?
         Egg age
At retrieval
P2
9.33–11.45 h
P3
0–1.73 h
Post P3 analysis
Cell counts
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Xtend algorithm (n=3000)
Blastulation Rate by Xtend Categories
 Categoría Xtend
No de embriones
1
840
 2
593
 3
497
 4
505
 5
506
  2 cells
Egg age
3 cells
4 cells
Day 3
          P3 P2
    Cell count
Post P3 analysis
91%
86,30%
79,70%
63%
12345
Perez Albala S, et al. ASRM 2018.
38,30%
             100
 PRECONGRESS COURSE 02 I VIENNA, AUSTRIA – 23 JUNE 2019 103
   


























   103   104   105   106   107