Page 80 - PRECONGRESS COURSE 06

References
• Dewailly et al., The physiology and clinical utility of anti‐Mullerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update, 2014; 20(5):804
• Iliodromiti et al., Ovarian response biomarkers: physiology and performance. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27:182‐186
• Fleming et al., Assessing ovarian response: antral follicle count versus anti‐Müllerian hormone. RBM 2015;31:486‐496
• Broekmans et al., The antral follicle count: practical recommendations for better standardization. Fertil Steril 2010;93:1044‐1051
• Mutlu et al., AFC determines poor ovarian response better than AMH but age is the only predictor for live birth in IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod
Genet 2013;30:657‐665
• Himabindu et al., AMH and AFC as predictors of ovarian response in assested reproduction. J Hum Reprod Sci 2013;6:27‐31
• Tsakos et al., Predictive value of AMH, FSH and AFC on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH‐antaganist protocol for
IVF/ET. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;290:1249‐1253
• Arce et al., Amh in GnRH antagonist cycles: prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good‐prognosis patients.
Fertil Steril 2013;99:1644‐1653
• Andersen et al., Predictive factors of ovarian response and clinical outcome afther IVF/ICSI following a rFSH/GnRH antagonist protocol with or
without oral contraceptive pre‐treatment. Human Reprod 2011;25:3413‐3423
• Nelson et al., Comparison of AMH levels and AFC as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in good‐prognosis
patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials. Fertil Steril 2015;103:923‐930
• Ganidou et al., Is assessment of AMH/AFC useful in the prediction of ovarian response in expected normal responders treated with a fixed
dose of recFSH and GnRH antagonists? A prospective observational study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30: 817‐21.
• Oehinger et al., Predictive factors of ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian
hyperstimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles. Reprod Biol and Endocrin 2015;13:117
• Freour et al., Ovarian reserve and in IVF cycles outcome according to women smoking status and stimulation regimen. Arch Gynecol Obstet
2012; 285: 1177‐82
• Bleil et al., Race/ethnic disparities in reproductive age: an examination of ovarian reserve estimates across four race/ethnic groups of healthy,
regularly cycling women. Fertil Steril 2014;101:199–207.
• Iglesias C et al., Ethnicity as a determinant of ovarian reserve: differences in ovarian aging between Spanish and Indian women. Fertil Steril
2014;102:244–9.
• Olcha et al , Genotypically determined ancestry across an infertile population: ovarian reserve and response parameters are not influenced
by continental origin. FS 2016; 106: 475‐80
• Bhide et al., Serum AMH levels across different ethnic groups: a cross sectional study. BJOG. 2015 Nov;122:1625‐9
• Elchuri S et al., AMH levels in American girls by age and race/ethnicity. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Jan;28:189‐93
• Seifer D et al. Variations in serum AMH between white, black, and Hispanic women. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1674–8.
• Gleicher N et al., Differences in ovarian aging patterns between races are associated with ovarian genotypes and sub‐genotypes of the FMR1
gene. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012;10:77.
• Dolleman et al., Reproductive and lifestyle determinant of AMH in a large population based study. JCEM 2013;98:2106‐15
• Moy et al. Obesity adversely affects serum AMH levels in Caucasian women. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015;32:1305‐11
• Halawaty et al., Effect of obesity on parameters of the ovarian reserves in premenopausal women. J Obset Gynecol Can 2010;32:687‐690 • Malhotra et al., Does obesity compromise ovarian reserve markers? A clinician perspective. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287:161‐166
• Caserta et al., The influence of cigarette smoking on a population of infertile men and women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287:813‐818
• Jayaprakasan K, et al. Effect of ethnicity on live birth rates after IVF or ICSI treatment. BJOG 2014;121:300–6.
• Hansen et al., Correlation of ORTs with histologically determined primordial follilce number. FS 2011;95:170‐195
80
Page 76 of 258